Which of these is NOT a requirement for pesticide record keeping?

The focus on record keeping in pesticide application is essential for ensuring compliance with safety standards and regulations. The requirement to maintain records that include the pesticide name is crucial because it helps identify the substances used and supports traceability in case of adverse effects or investigations. Recording weather conditions is also significant, as environmental factors can impact the effectiveness of pesticide applications, as well as safety. Additionally, keeping track of the amount of product used is vital for assessing environmental impact and managing resources efficiently.

While documenting the applicator's signature may seem important, it is not a standard requirement in many regulatory frameworks. The primary emphasis in pesticide record keeping is usually on the details that directly relate to the use of pesticides and their potential effects, rather than on the identity of the individual who applied them. Therefore, the requirement that does not align with established guidelines for pesticide record keeping is the one related to the applicator's signature.