Under federal law, which statement about trained and certified applicators is true?

Trained and certified applicators have the authority to apply or supervise the application of restricted-use pesticides (RUPs) as a result of their training and certification. This means that they possess the necessary knowledge and skills to handle these potentially hazardous substances safely and responsibly. Restricted-use pesticides are classified as such due to their potential for misuse or adverse effects on human health and the environment, which is why only individuals who meet specific training and certification criteria are allowed to handle them.

The concept of requiring certification is essential in ensuring that applicators understand the risks associated with handling RUPs, including proper application techniques, compliance with local and federal regulations, and understanding the environmental impact of pesticide use. This authority helps protect public health, promote environmental safety, and ensure that pesticide applications are effective and responsible.

In contrast, the other statements do not align with the established regulations governing pesticide usage. For example, while additional training may be beneficial, it is not a prerequisite in all cases for mixing RUPs. Moreover, trained applicators are still required to adhere to regulations regarding endangered species protection, and they cannot apply pesticides without undergoing certification, reflecting the importance of rigorous standards in pesticide application.